There is no doubt the rush to figure out Native Advertising is on. What is not totally clear is whether it is really bringing a breathless amount of innovation or whether we are re-packaging old ideas in a new bottle.
The more I dig into it, the more I’m seeing Native Advertising as a re-packaging of previous methods. But that’s a good thing, because sometimes, old ideas are tested and they work.
Maybe Native Advertising is how online advertising should have been a long time ago. Instead, banner ads hijacked online content sites for a long time. Until Native Advertising came to the rescue.
I’m not an expert on advertising models or “ad-tech”, so I’ll take a simple, naïve, consumer perspective into this, because that’s how advertising that’s well made should be: simple to understand and without a complicated message.
Back to Basics, with David Ogilvy
I’ve recently taken to re-reading the work of David Ogilvy, the father of modern advertising, because he laid down so many good principles, especially as an early advocate of the soft sell approach in advertising. He said this:“It has been found that the less an advertisement looks like an advertisement and the more it looks like an editorial, the more readers stop, look, and read.”and this:
“Are your ads looking more like magazine spreads yet?”With that backdrop, I’m sure you’ll agree that the current generation of hip Web and social companies did not invent native advertising. But let’s hope they adopt some good old principles into the new trend. We could say that advertorials and in-store advertisements were precursors to “native advertising”, and they have been around for long time. Advertorials blend education within the promotional message, and in-store advertisements rely on contextualizing the message with the proximity of the purchase intent. In-store Display Advertising. When you’re in a food store, and there’s a flat screen monitor displaying “monounsaturated fats, Vitamin C, and fiber are good for you, and avocados are full of them”, and 2 minutes later, you see a bag of 4 avocados for $1.99, chances are you will buy it. That’s native advertising (inside their premises), and it’s also contextual to the purchase intent, because you went into the store to buy food. Were you educated, engaged and benefited, or were we just marketed to? Yes to all. Advertorials (TV or Print). Do you remember Fortune or BusinessWeek full page or multi-page themed advertorials, written-up like a story, with quotes and fancy facts? How about the late night TV advertorials where it looked like someone is interviewing an expert, but they are really washing your brain to buy a product.

Some Examples from Today
Today, it would be beneficial to re-learn Ogilvy’s principles, because we have an opportunity to blend foundational principles of advertising with the new possibilities of online and social media. We’re starting to see some innovations. Provisions by Food52 is a juxtaposition of content with e-commerce, and it’s a brilliant idea. The recipe is like a subtle advertisement for the goods you can purchase. After you read a food recipe, you need to buy things to make it happen, whether it’s the ingredients or cooking accessories. Provisions connects you straight to an e-commerce marketplace.

Native Advertising Requirements
I am a disciple of David Ogilvy’s principles. I believe that advertising has to be presented as a soft sell about something useful, while being true to the product or service’s promise (the benefit). This lead me to this statement about Native Advertising:Native Advertising’s promise is to blend with the content so we feel less interrupted; that it educates at the same time as it promotes; and that it has some contextual magic that appeals to our emotional acceptance of it.To be more specific, consider the 3 parts of good native advertising, and my challenge to the Native Advertising creators is to stay true to the Value, Delivery, Format, Placement and Targeting goals that are depicted in this graph:
